An open letter to Nick Xenophon
Independent Senator for South Australia.
Yo, Nick.
Garth here. We share a few things, so I hope you don’t mind the input. You were a small business guy (albeit a lawyer) who got into politics for specific reasons. Me, too. You’re now concerned the people you represent can’t afford houses any more. Ditto. You think the middle class is reasonably screwed. I’m with you there. We tweet. We blog. And, of course, we both fondle goats.
However, Nick, I’m not loving your most recent crusade. In fact, I think you need a better research assistant because you’ve just messed up as far as Canada is concerned. The last thing you Aussies should want to do is slide down the slippery path of encouraging more moist virgins to jump headlong into inflated houses and bloated debt.
I just read this about you, dude:
Independent Senator for South Australia, Nick Xenophon, will introduce legislative changes in the Spring session of parliament to allow first home buyers to access their superannuation savings to pay a house deposit. Such a scheme successfully operates in Canada, called Home Buyers’ Plan, leading to improved housing affordability.
At a Senate Economics References Committee hearing in Adelaide today, the Inquiry heard from HomeStart Finance (an arm of the South Australian Government) outlining the Canadian scheme. In Canada up to $25,000 can be accessed for a first home, and it’s made a dramatic difference for housing affordability there.
However, Senator Xenophon will be moving for changes to Superannuation Act 1976 to allow the release to superannuation funds for a first home, with similar safeguards to the Canadian scheme. In Canada the amount has to be paid back into the super fund within 15 years.
“With more and more Australians finding it difficult to break into home ownership, adopting the Canadian scheme would make a difference to many thousands of Australians each year,” Nick said. Housing affordability in Australia has fallen for the past three decades, as house prices outstrip income growth.
An annual affordability survey by Demographia this year found Australia had the second-worst housing affordability in the world, behind Hong Kong. All 39 Australian housing markets surveyed were “seriously” or “severely” unaffordable, defined as having average house prices more than four times average income.
I confess. Once I thought like you. I even supported realtors years ago when they cooked up this scheme to allow kids to dip into their retirement funds to buy a first home. At the time we were in a steep recession with real estate plunging and the economy in a funk. So, I voted in our Parliament for a temporary program to create the Home Buyer’s Plan in order to stabilize the market and try to revitalize the home-building business. It worked, kinda. Then subsequent governments (a) made the plan permanent and (b) doubled the amount people can suck out of their registered savings.
Now, Nick, we’re reaping the bitter harvest sown when that dumbass legislation passed. Allowing first-time buyers to remove tax-free money to buy a modest home they could not otherwise afford, then restore it to their long-term retirement savings makes perfect sense in theory. In practice and experience, just the opposite.
To date the HBP has been used about 2.5 million times, with roughly $30 billion removed from savings and investments and plowed into real estate. When combined with dirt-cheap mortgage rates (I notice Aussie banks just slashed five-year rates to an all-time low) and voracious, carnivorous bankers, it’s helped push home prices into the clouds. The cost of an average detached house in two of our major cities now exceeds $1 million. (I see median home prices in Sydney rocketed 17% in the past year, to $812,000. So you know what I mean.)
In other words, if you think letting people steal money from their financial futures in order to buy houses today which they really can’t afford is going to make real estate more affordable, you’ve been spending too many evenings with the goat. The opposite is probable. In Canada, it’s fact.
But it gets worse. The evidence also shows when you allow this kind of distorting financial activity to take place, people respond badly. They borrow their brains out, Nicky. Total horniness. As I wrote on this pathetic but repentant blog recently, the kids aren’t even paying this money back – which means we’ve not only goosed houses, increased the risk of a serious correction and skewed the condo economy further – but there are billions less being saved and invested for our pensionless future.
Nick, you need to know this: the latest Canada Revenue Agency stats found almost half (47%) of the borrowers who raided their RRSPs haven’t paid anything back. So the missed payments are added to their incomes and taxed. And why would the virgins be so dumb?
Simple. They don’t have the cash. They borrowed to the max, took advantage of cheap rates and willing bankers, sucked off the tax-free money guys like you (and me) provided, and likely bought their home in a bidding war, forcing prices higher. Bad outcome. Now more Canadians have financing worth over 80% of their home values than Americans had before the big crash.
So, buddy, back off. The goal of a caring politician isn’t to shoehorn more people into debt and bad decisions, just because they want it. Instead, your role is to lead, to stand up for common sense, and battle the forces of cheap expediency and sleazy solutions.
I mean, look where it got me.
163 comments ↓
The correction will not begin till the end of 2015, but it will happen.
“I mean, look where it got me.”
You walk the walk.
I think that there are several billion in the middle east who fondle goats. Maybe worse, but the goats can’t talk.
It’s beyond me how you needed to put this into effect before you learned this lesson. Politicians have such a poor understanding of basic economics it’s tragic.
Misery loves company. Let the Aussies go ahead with this so Canadians can feel better about their real estate stupidity.
Although I’m not sure how much better we’ll collectively feel to be lumped together with Aussies, but that’s a personal matter each Canadian will have to deal with.
I think many Turnerites will agree that this is just one of the many gems you have posted of late.
This should be stapled on everyone’s forehead.
*Bravo Zulu, Garth.
Pertinent: http://www.idiottax.net/2014/08/nick-xenophon-needs-punch-in-face.html
Allowing individuals to use pre-tax dollars to buy a levered investment 20:1 has created enormous amounts of paper wealth in this country.
The only problem is it too heavily favours one industry, at the direct expense of all others and I’m surprised they haven’t caught on. Why haven’t car companies lobbied to have RRSPs raided for first time car buyers?
Those who see the threats however are usually relegated to blog duties and those with any influence are too busy trying to secure campaign donations to care.
Nice Post!
I decidedly disagree that the situation is happenstance, as in we simply happen to be here
Humans are easy to trick and this whole mess was by design
Garth, good to see you chipping in against this self serving hypocrite.
Lets be clear – Senator Xenophon maintains an impressive portfolio of eight investment properties – so will do anything to keep the bubble inflating.
Just like all the other Australian Politicians sitting on $300million of property assets.
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2014/08/aussie-politicians-300m-property-portfolio/
And one wonders why politicians are viewed with more contempt than realtors.
What is he thinking? The Aussie housing market (like Canada’s) is already in danger territory…I guess this policy could win him some votes from horny, moist virgins…forget the goat, the lambkins are going to slaughtered.
Great post. Hopefully Xenophon takes note and listens as he has been copping a lot of negative press around this issue in local media also. Certainly not helped by him owning multiple investment properties which would be sure to benefit from such a scheme:
https://twitter.com/BullionBaron/status/496600170864181248
Australia has already tried the deposit boosting trick to improve housing affordability in 2008/2009 when they introduced the First Home Owners Boost (which was in addition to the existing First Home Owners Grant) which pulled forward demand, sending prices higher (as FHBs leveraged the deposit to compete against each other) and worsening affordability. Now with First Home Buyer demand waning again he wants to pull the same stunt? Rethink it Xenophon.
“the forces of cheap expediency and sleazy solutions.”
Hmmm…. I do believe I dated her…
Well, remembrances aside, Garth your advice was spot on.
Nobody should be raiding their tax deferred, or tax free savings for a stupid place to pee, sleep, and raise a family.
The chances are you might get old someday, or become disabled before you planned to retire. You could croak off sooner than your actuarial date, like the 23 year old neighbor who was testing, and driving after he left the local pub late Saturday night. Whether legally drunk, or merely on his way, the tragic result of not watching where one is going was the same…no more texts… EVER!!
While we never know what the morrow brings, plan for tomorrow, you might just be there unless you text & drive.
You might never own a home, and that would not be so bad. At least you would be old with cash for choices, not house poor with piddly savings. While a mortgage can be a long time, life is even longer. live it well, piss off your friends!
The unintended consequences of well-intentioned legislation can create problems far worse than the ones that it was supposed to solve.
I am sure that it seemed like ia good idea at the time, but with the power of hindsight we now know it was a bad idea!
Dam auto correct should read t-e-x–t-i-n-g.
Great advice from someone uniquely qualified to offer it.
(Where’s the photo of you with the goat?)
[…] Source: http://www.greaterfool.ca/2014/08/06/no-kidding/ […]
The government can’t be held responsible for first time buyers over extending there budgets. People will find a way to shoot themselves in the foot if you let them. The home-buyers plan is a valuable tool that can be used responsibly to purchase a first home. Let people decide themselves what to spend their investment dollars on, even though I agree that the current prices are insane in many canadian markets.
Garth , your advice to Mr. Xenophon may turn him into a Xenophobe.
hmmmmmmmmm
Nick, ever hear the saying “If no one comes from the future to try and stop you, how bad of a decision could it really be?”. Consider this a visit from the future.
The only people in have a slight twinge of xenophobia for are Italians who LOVE real estate……..
Thanks Garth..have sent this along to my Aussie rellies.
Rampant RE spec has been going on Downunder for many years now.
They have no CPP equivalent, OA pension is means tested, and what they call Supers are a nightmare mishmash of hundreds of plans. However, things are different there!
@#3 Randy
( ironic name for one who is pontificating about beastality)
Goat fondling? I think there are a few million Scottish and New Zealand sheep that may disagree with you.
But they’re not halal so they’re safe……… :)
I borrowed from my RRSP 10 years ago, and it will be all paid back next year (2014 tax return). We sold the house last fall for almost double what we paid, and then bought a condo cash and clear, and put the rest in RRSP and Tax Free savings account. It can work if people are mature and think things through. Today, we have kidults into their 30’s who are not just house horny, but pure hedonists. And this my friends is the problem. You may as well just sit back and watch the show.
Very bad idea, Garth. Without my house horny young supporters buying particleboard semis here in beautiful Brampton, they won’t be paying any more land transfer tax here.
Where will I funnel the money from, to pay for my Mandarin lessons at the Royal York, or first class airfares, or online IQ tests?
I can see why you were kicked out of caucus. Not a team player :(
Lot of middle class jobs going in Oz next few years. As Ford,GM & Toyota pull out and decimate their local suppliers.
The blokes out of touch.
That’s a great message to Nick the Aussie Senator Garth. I will be surprised if he listens to you though even though he absolutely should. I was in Australia 11 years ago for 3 months, and to me and my traveling partners observations, the Australians make the Americans look quiet and humble.
tl;dr
I think there were plenty of positive results from the Home Buyers Plan. You just had to have not been a homeowner for 10 yrs. Repeat failures got a second chance because in a boom or bust place like Canada, you don’t want the austerity, survival, sales types, never getting back in. That was the thinking and if they have a real estate property, they are probably as well off as if they had a G.I.C. in an R.R.S.P. I fail to see at what point in history a Canadian political party, ever got elected on affordable housing.
1 chopper on 08.06.14 at 7:38 pm
Couldn’t agree more. Harper will pull out all the stops to keep this gas bag floating leading up to the next election. Then, regardless who forms the next government, watch out below, especially in the frothiest markets. (Van. & TO I’m lookin’ at you). Bread and circuses will continue until then.
I just don’t get it?? Are people so out of touch with economic reality these days? Are they so blind to the obvious? Why is the concept that when you make credit and “Free” money easier and easier to acquire, the cost of goods gets more expensive??
Hey Nick, guess what, when you make it harder for people to get cheap and easy credit, when you make it harder for people to get a deposit to purchase a house guess what…………PRICES GO DOWN AND HOUSES BECOME MORE AFFORDABLE. When you have a population that cannot afford grossly overpriced houses and you don’t give them the means to pay those overly exorbitant prices……again, guess what, the prices go down.
The concept is so easy even a lawyer could (should) understand it.
“All 39 Australian housing markets surveyed were “seriously” or “severely” unaffordable, defined as having average house prices more than four times average income.” and “Australia had the second-worst housing affordability in the world”.
Am I reading this right? Four times average income is “severely” unaffordable! Cripes …Where does that put Canada? The one and a half worst housing affordable in the world?
I’ve noticed asking prices in my Ottawa neighbourhood drop by 20% in the last year and people still think the market is HOT! Enough of this propaganda already! The information age is making people stupid!
#138 Mark on 08.06.14 at 6:26 pm…
…”Sure. But a portion of that is to pay for fixed infrastructure. At some point, if enough people start self-generation, the tariff will have to change to a fixed infrastructure fee + wholesale cost of generation. At Palo Verdes, a commonly used reference price in Arizona, around $30-40 per megawatt hour on average.
==================================
Mark, Mark, Mark; this is really silly!
Our Utility has utilized an infrastructure fee + wholesale cost of generation in its billing for quite some time now… You’re behind the times! Most of the Electric Co-op utilities in Arizona buy their power wholesale from somebody else, and those costs are rising.
As for “Palo Verdes”, you’re perhaps referring to the “Palo Verde” nuclear generating station at Tonopah, AZ? The only “Palo Verdes” I’m aware of is in California.
The Tonopah nuclear plant is not at all used as a general reference price for all of Arizona, where most of the plants are run on natural gas. It is rather an exception to the gas/coal/wind/geothermal, solar etc. plants dotting the state.
see http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=AZ
Wholesale power generation/distribution and retail consumption are two totally different things, as you know very well, so don’t try to confuse the issue…
You’re far from the dimmest bulb in the chandelier after all. Get real!
Costs of generation and distribution
Really happy to see this get some intelligent unbiased coverage. It’s a pathetic ploy to keep the ridiculous prices in Sydney and Melbourne propped up for people like Xenaphon with vested interests who own 8 properties themselves.
Hey Nick, you should listen to Garth. We’re watching ya now. See ya 5 years down the road.
What happened to the goat after taking the pic?
http://postimg.org/image/ejpfr9l83/
6 years I believed a house price correction was right around the corner. No sign of one yet. What will be the catalyst? Interest rate hike, the boomers selling or a combination of both? Which leads to the next question of; when are the rates going to rise? Next year? Year after that? When are the boomers going to unload their houses? 2 years? 5 years? Never because they can’t afford to retire..? So in 1-3 years we will have a correction of 10-15%… Wow,That’s amazing… It’s still going to be unaffordable! Even if it’s 700k and a 15% correction happens and the house is 105k cheaper, it’s still unaffordable. Especially since rates will be higher. If you live outside of GTA and Van city it will be good, but in those two cities, I think you just have to accept that you’re screwed.
A 30% correction in the US carved $6 trillion from the middle class, precipitated a global recession and permanently injured the finances of millions. I would not underestimate the consequences of a correction here, of any magnitude. — Garth
nick : if you have an ounce of sense you will back off and tell everyone ‘I made a mistake. Its a really bad idea’
and you better unload those properties mate…. it wont take much to pop your housing bubble.
Has anyone told Joe Owe? Ah… never mind.
“Our Utility has utilized an infrastructure fee + wholesale cost of generation in its billing for quite some time now… You’re behind the times! Most of the Electric Co-op utilities in Arizona buy their power wholesale from somebody else, and those costs are rising. “
And they buy at wholesale, 240kV or 500kV, for $30-$40/megawatt hour on average. The reason why it gets marked up to $135/megawatt hour (13.5c/kw-hour) is to pay for the fixed infrastructure, transformers, etc. involved with such.
Now, if people, on any significant basis use solar panels, and keep the ‘grid’ around as a backup, the grid still has to be paid for. The gap between the $135/MW-hour they sell at, and the $30-$40/MW-hour they buy at represents money paid to build real infrastructure, maintain that real infrastructure, etc. All of which does not magically disappear because you happen to have solar panels pumping out a megawatt-hour a month on the sunny days.
And yes, the Palo Verde switch yard (500kV) is co-located with a 3-unit nuclear power plant of the same namesake. Real-time and average pricing at the proverbial “Palo Verde” bus-bar is used as a reference point for pricing various financial contracts and risk management products on electricity in Arizona.
“6 years I believed a house price correction was right around the corner. No sign of one yet”
Have you been asleep for the past year? Prices have been falling in most Canadian centres, although only a few percentage points at best thus far. The stock market, heck, even financial assets like GICs and bonds, are starting to outperform housing, and all the evidence is that such will continue for a long time to come.
everything for the banks.
usury should be prohibited by law, when you earn and have money, then spend it. If you don’t have any, too bad, you are not buying.
But to give money to spend to people that don’t have anything while ‘insured’ by the rest of us?
Gold standard looks much better. It is coming.
It is not. — Garth
Not a gold bug but it is coming.
No serious country will ever re-establish commodity-backed currency. Stop dreaming. — Garth
well commodities will appreciate anyway, whether money are backed by it? Who cares? Just invest in commodities, they ARE going up.
FIXED…
A 30% correction in the US carved $6 TRILLION from the middle class, precipitated a global recession and permanently injured the finances of millions. I would not underestimate the consequences of a correction here, of any magnitude. — Garth
Yesss, thanks. — Garth
Yes, it’s basic economics. When the supply of money increases (as when interest rates are low) people have more money to spend, which drives up demand, and thus prices. This is classic inflation: more money = higher prices.
Therefore, changing the rules to allow people to access money they could not access before, effectively increases the money supply (if only in one sector).
The problem is not so much that the money is available. It’s the change in the rules that causes the problem. Like so many government fiscal and monetary policies, constantly changing the rules distorts the market and results in poor allocation of capital.
Cheap money creates the illusion of affordability, but the reduction in the debt service costs is off-set by the increase in price.
In other words, people shoot themselves in both feet because 1) they are apt to take on more debt than they would otherwise, and; 2) their own fiscal imprudence drives up prices.
We have seen the enemy, and it is us. Plus all the tools who wittingly or otherwise help drive more money into the coffers of the banks to the detriment of the people.
BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto.
Commodity money with 4 % dividend.
How much was the interest rates on that GIC deposit?
“No serious country will ever re-establish commodity-backed currency. Stop dreaming”
Perhaps not for domestic use, but as a means of settling imbalances in international trade, there’s a very high probability of such occurring. The US dollar serves the role today, but its on awfully shaky ground.
Wrong on both counts. — Garth
Blasphemy!
Leadership abounds in the political arena, current stellar crop of Lawyers, economists, and assorted fart catchers now on par with house and car sales “professionals”
So screwed. ………
west does not understand Russia, they are not backing up.
Back to the drawing board with a revised deal.
And please shut harpo, he makes us look like idiots.
JimH only reason I was asking about Bullhead Az
Be down in your neck of the woods, Aug24 to Aug 28
Being a budding pilot you are, there is a place on Narada, that rent out Extra300 we can dog fight each other…
About 600 bucks, only draw back, we got to take one of there pilots with us.
You in…
Garth you have it all wrong. If you are underwater down under, you are actually ahead of the game.
#40 Mark on 08.06.14 at 9:18 pm
The highest electricity generating costs come from the need for the electric companies to meet short periods of peak demand.
Utilities must have the capacity to satisfy those short periods of peak demand, but because electricity cannot feasibly be stored, it must all be generated on a on-demand basis. Having the capacity to satisfy the short-term spikes is very costly.
In the past, only industrial customers were charged a hefty premium for peak demand (by exceeding a set threshold), while home owners basically paid a blended flat rate. But now they charge everyone based on time of use. I guess they figured out they can make more money that way.
In fact, building out new infrastructure is so costly that governments are attempting to delay same by devising such hair-brained schemes as Feed In Tariff programs, which pay people insane per-KWh rates to generate electricity using wind and solar.
Garth, I understand…
I love how you just say it. Thanks Garth for the insight and all the advocacy over the years. Great writing again.
“The highest electricity generating costs come from the need for the electric companies to meet short periods of peak demand. “
Sure. And solar panels are entirely unpredictable and neither are dispatchable nor qualify as ‘spinning reserves’. For the same reasons, they do not meaningfully relieve transmission line infrastructure requirements either.
At best, the only advantage solar power has to sites that already have a grid interconnection is a reduction in line losses.
“In fact, building out new infrastructure is so costly that governments are attempting to delay same by devising such hair-brained schemes as Feed In Tariff programs, which pay people insane per-KWh rates to generate electricity using wind and solar.”
No, the purpose of those programs is mainly to appease their supporter base, typical left-ist types. Most are not economic by any stretch once the subsidies, explicit and implicit are removed. Do you really think its prudent to base a business plan on subsidies from heavily indebted governments existing forever? Sounds just as wise as the folks who think that CMHC will be able to underwrite enough subprime loan guarantees to keep the Canadian housing market forever levitated.
Raghuram Rajan warns of global market ‘crash’
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/rbi-governor-raghuram-rajan-warns-of-global-market-crash/articleshow/39766279.cms
He also warns, “it may not happen.” Some prediction. — Garth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsL6mKxtOlQ
#39 Mark on 08.06.14 at 9:18 pm
Have you considered that the model for utility pricing might be a relic of the industrial revolution and is ripe for change?
Why should maintenance costs of the generating plant and distribution system be based on the consumption of the user? With this wasteful model, utilities need ever increasing customer consumption to thrive. This worked great well up until about 15 years ago as households geared up with evermore electric gadgets.
Now we are seeing the exodus of high power user industries to low cost manufacturing countries and the advent of high efficiency lighting, appliances and motors in residential customers. This is creating a perfect excess capacity storm for the hydro companies in the same way that flat water consumption is causing headaches for the water works.
Green energy is not the problem. Old monolithic pricing policies are what needs to be rethought to maintain the grid and keep the lights on.
That’s it, I am investing in goats.
Bound to be the backbone of currencies sooner than later. And if all else fails you can eat them.
House in my hood listed for $4m. Dropped to $3.6M. Will take an offer just North of $3M. Probably all in around 2.8M to build the thing (if you could find a similar lot). The guy selling it is stinky rich. He can’t believe how the market has cooled down.
Another house around here sold for 1.25M two years ago…cannot get 1.15M for the exact same house (next lot over, same developer, no known liabilities) since last Feb.
Of course, my sister in law put a piece of junk up for $450K, had 21 offers and sold for $35 above list…no inspection…vermiculite abounds…
Patience…even in Cowtown things are slowing down. It’s the 450-700K “starter” home that are still heated.
#40 Mark
Mark. Please get this, will you? I’m not “off” the grid. ; I depend on it! The grid is my customer!
Of course, the grid doesn’t disappear! It is never there simply as a “back-up” as you suggest! I am on the grid 24/7, 12 months a year, unless of course the grid goes down, in which case, so do I. I cannot produce into a vacuum.
I’m on the grid; as both a consumer and a in my case, more importantly, as a producer. I depend upon it! I have the best of both worlds; I can consume (buy) off the grid whenever necessary and produce (sell) to the grid if my production exceeds my consumption.
The bottom line in all of this, which you seem to be missing, or conveniently avoiding, is that my system is cost effective in an environment of rising costs.
My annualized ROI, based on my guaranteed (conservative/minimum, call it what you will) production is 12.38% with a 8.8 year maximum payback. As I demonstrated earlier, we are running at least 8% above those conservative projections.
Before we put this system in, we questioned and grilled many producers in out community, and got the scoop “right from the horses’ mouths” (with apologies to my neighbors). Their electric billings were all I needed to examine for the viability of the local electric co-op’s program. I asked similar questions about solar contractors, and went away with 4 recommendations…
And here we are. I love the concept of a 12.38% GUARANTEED ROI. I’m sometimes open to greed and I like that. 12.38% or better? WTF is wrong with that?
On another level, I love the concept of so far having offset, during this short few months, the same amount of CO2 as the planting of 99 trees. All the while saving/making money… oops… there I go again.
Sorry you don’t get it, Mark. I’m even more saddened that you continue to throw out these red herrings, straw men, previously discredited arguments, irrelevant and far off-topic non-issues.
I can’t say for sure, but I think I just might have been trading equities and derivatives when you were still a twinkle in your daddy’s eye. I didn’t put this system in because I needed to, Mark. I put it in because, after a lot of number crunching, it made good sense.
I trade and manage my life from facts, Mark. Scientific facts and empirical data. I don’t let my emotions or my ideology drive me away from that discipline, because years ago, I made a lot of very bad, silly moves when I let those things interfere…
Man up… you’re wrong on this one!
Many years ago, in the late 90’s, I borrowed about $11,000 from my RRSP to buy my first house, which was about all I had in the RRSP at the time. I also maxed out the CMHC thing which at the time would only cover $175,000. Hard to think now, that wouldn’t buy a condo.
Then my wife divorced me and took the house. Somehow, I think the government lost the paperwork because I don’t recall ever paying the money back into the RRSP, although I have many times that in there now. Or maybe they transferred the obligation to her since she had the house. I have no idea. Anyway I didn’t have the house anymore and they stopped asking. Or maybe I paid it back and forgot. Anyway, like I said I have many times more in there now and it would be below accounting thresholds to revisit the issue.
Anyway, what I am really interested in is how the Amazon ladies are coping with your leg and how that is going. I mean there must be some message positions that have been uncomfortable. How are the ladies holding out? And have you had the Harley fitted with hand levers? Are the Amazons driving you around in the Hummer?
@Smudgekin, post #26:
Yes, lots of automotive sector jobs will be lost as Ford, Holden (GM), and Toyota pull out of Australia. Why? Just like in Canada, the high cost of housing drives up the cost of doing business there. The only long term sustainable way to make housing more affordable is for people to have good, well paying jobs rather than an unsustainable rob the future to pay inflated prices now Ponzi scheme.
Australians like to fiddle around with the playbook.
Just watch a game of ‘Australian Rules’ Football. It ain’t the CFL, that’s for damn sure.
I have no idea what’s happening on the field but it certainly is rip-roaring entertainment to watch. Maybe we will be able to say the same for Aussie Rules investing.
#53 Inglorious Investor
…”programs, which pay people insane per-KWh rates to generate electricity using wind and solar.”
=================================
Post the actual application link for these programs, please.
I’m sure many here would love to see if they’re eligible for those “insane per Kwh rates to produce electricity using wind and solar”.
“Why should maintenance costs of the generating plant and distribution system be based on the consumption of the user? “
If you’ve followed my comments, I agreed whole-heartedly — the very simplistic electricity pricing model is broken by those who effectively ‘free ride’ on all of the investment in infrastructure who are allowed to displace fully-infrastructure-burdened power with their own production.
Once you actually go to use wholesale electricity costs and add on a component for pro rata infrastructure (relied upon as backup), the numbers for solar panels are completely uneconomic as I pointed out earlier.
“And here we are. I love the concept of a 12.38% GUARANTEED ROI. I’m sometimes open to greed and I like that. 12.38% or better? WTF is wrong with that?”
Its not guaranteed as it relies upon giant subsidies and an unsustainable pricing model for infrastructure that you’re effectively free-riding on. And even at that, a 12% ROI isn’t impressive at all. Sure, if you can afford it, and want to feel that you’re ‘saving the Earth’, its a good hobby. But when you look at the full cycles of internal and external expense, and the heavy reliance on subsidy, your solar panels are not a good investment.
How do these Canadians afford these million dollar homes? Is it a result of big government pensions, 0% interest rates, parents choice, or a sugar daddy/ sugar mommy funding part of the downpayment?
Just the other day someone bid over 250,000$ over asking price for a 3 story house in one of those cul-de-sacs at midtown Yonge street.
It’s crazy dude, it’s only a house, not like it’s commercial real estate…oh wait..
Went to the sit of a big Canadian bank to see how much they would lend me. Wow. You guys are screwed. So screwed. Hilarious amount. No way would I ever have imagined it would be that much. No way would I borrow that much. Madness.
A mumber of blog dogs have drawn attention to the syndication of dubious auto loans. US authorities share these concerns. One possible impact is a slump in domestic auto sales which are being effectively front end loaded.
“Focusing on G.M. Unit, U.S. Starts Civil Inquiry of Subprime Car Lending – NYTimes.com”
QUOTE
Federal prosecutors have begun a civil investigation into the booming business of subprime auto lending, focusing on the packaging and selling of questionable loans to investors.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/08/04/focusing-on-g-m-unit-u-s-starts-civil-inquiry-of-subprime-car-lending/
#56 Mark on 08.06.14 at 10:04 pm
“And solar panels are entirely unpredictable and neither are dispatchable nor qualify as ‘spinning reserves’. For the same reasons, they do not meaningfully relieve transmission line infrastructure requirements either.”
Right. No sunny. No money. However, think about this: PVs work best when the sun is strongest, and that’s exactly when extra capacity is needed most (e.g. hot, sunny, summer days).
———————-
“At best, the only advantage solar power has to sites that already have a grid interconnection is a reduction in line losses.”
Interesting…
——————-
“No, the purpose of those programs is mainly to appease their supporter base, typical left-ist types.”
Not sure I agree with that one. Though, I would not be surprised if there were other motives that I am just not privy to. ;)
—————–
“Most are not economic by any stretch once the subsidies, explicit and implicit are removed. Do you really think its prudent to base a business plan on subsidies from heavily indebted governments existing forever?”
That’s just one of the many reasons I did not go for a MicroFIT installation myself. But don’t forget, governments don’t typically think long term. If they can dampen prices while they are in power, they would likely do it, even it means their polices and programs cause much higher prices down the road. If ‘successful’ the current government won’t get the blame. So the whole thing might just be a delay tactic (?)
#65 JimH on 08.06.14 at 10:28 pm
It’s the MicroFIT program. Try this: http://microfit.powerauthority.on.ca/
He also warns, “it may not happen.” Some prediction. — Garth
He also predicted the 2008 crash, it is hard to accept reality
I once considered a rooftop solar installation for my home under the MicroFIT program in Ontario. At the time, they were paying something like 83¢/kWh. The installers love to claim ROI’s of about 10%-15% (at least last time I checked).
However, after running the numbers (which involved a great many inputs), the projected real ROI was only about 1.5%. And that did not include potential repairs to damaged solar panels or replacement of worn out parts (which are basically unknown). And even some maintenance costs were difficult to nail down, so the ROI I calculated is actually something of a best-case scenario at only 2.5% inflation.
After I decided to forgo this ‘opportunity’ the government cut the pay rate to around 60¢/kWh. Making the ROI even worse. And remember, a PV installation is not like real estate, which generally appreciates in value. At the end of the contract your PV installation will likely be worth nothing due to wear and tear, diminished efficiency, and technological obsolescence.
Now, under the MircoFIT program, the power you generate does not go toward off-setting your own grid consumption. You use the grid just like anybody else. You simply get paid for whatever electricity you generate.
An Australian themed post… never has Aussie Roy’s absence been felt so much.
Damn.
The Aussie’s have always been 7-10 years behind the curve, the Kiwis another 3-5 years behind them.
Back to Canada, is a lower Canadian $ the first step to trying to shore up our lousy economy. Many buttons will need pushing but this one the easiest to swallow, keeps the CAN$ in CAN too!
Independent Senator for South Australia, Nick Xenophon,
who is very much like Xena the Warrior Princess the character played by Lucy Lawless who in fact was married to Garth:
Lucy also has a daughter, Daisy Lawless, from her first marriage to Garth
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005128/?ref_=tt_ov_st
Not much hope for housing affordability legislation in Australia – politicians are heavily into property themselves!
http://blog.australiaboomtobust.com/2014/08/propertied-federal-political-class/
Well said Garth,
Hopefully you knock some sense into Nick.
“Right. No sunny. No money. However, think about this: PVs work best when the sun is strongest, and that’s exactly when extra capacity is needed most (e.g. hot, sunny, summer days).”
Sure, but when the clouds on those hot/humid/muggy days a’rise, the air conditioners are a’blowin at full blast, ultimately those solar panels need to be backed up with additional capacity. Usually very expensive rapidly dispatchable simple-cycle gas turbine sets.
I guess, hysterics aside, the point I’m trying to make is that solar panel economics should be more properly using long-term wholesale pricing as the reference, with a discount for the lack of dispatch ability, spinning reserve capability, and some other technical aspects such as reactive power creation. The people who have based their business plans on pie-in-the-sky subsidized prices are in for an eventual rude awakening. Much like a giant swath of Canadian employment is now based on supplying housing, an industry which has been severely over-stimulated through the CMHC’s $900B in subprime guarantees and will create huge job losses for many years to come as the Canadian RE bubble continues to pop.
speaking of the great land down under, does anyone have any info or advice on- Australian REIT Income Fund – (HRR.WT:TSX)
and what the hell does the WT stand for in the symbol ?
Got an email from TeeDee:
2.77%
4-Year Fixed Term Mortgage¹
Garth, if you want people to listen, you gotta speak there lingo dude. Instead of ,”So, buddy, back off. ….”
you should have thrown in a bit of Strine and started off with
“Crikey mate, ……. ”
Show some cultural sensitivity and political correctness ……
#60 Mark,
Not sure what you guys are on about but if you dry camp in an RV an 80 – 160 watt solar panel will keep the generator in storage most of the time. Ya, you still need the generator. But a single tank of gas can last all summer with that panel. Assuming no air-conditioning. If you turn that thing on bring a jerry can a day of gas.
I personally have 2 130 watt panels on my RV. 2 is a waste. Only get 1. If you have 2 you don’t have enough battery to absorb the charge (I have 2 golf cart batteries 6v in series, 200 AH), but if there is no sun or you are under a tree 40 panels wouldn’t be enough. Bright sun on one panel or crack out the generator. Learn from my mistakes.
But when the sun is shining I make a lot less noise than my fellow campers. We can charge our iPhones, run computers, we even have an energy efficient 24 inch TV and it all works off the panels. But for god sakes if you want to use a generator get an inverter style.
Also another reason solar panels are better than generators for a 12v system. You can’t charge a battery like filling a gas tank. It takes time. You run that generator for 2 hours, if you got an old trailer you are putting 5 amps into the battery. Great. You’ve got yourself 10 amp hours. Means dick. The solar panel puts in 5 amps all day so you might under ideal conditions get 50 amp hours.
Oh and no that 42 inch plasma tv that came with the RV won’t work if you aren’t plugged in or running the generator. That sucker need 150 watts, or over 12 amps to run off the inverter. So if you have an 80 amp-hour battery and they don’t work good after 50% drained, well you have 3 hours if you don’t use anything else including the lights and the water pump. Swap it out for a small LDC tv using 30 watts or so.
What I’ve learned from camping is that going solar is all about the batteries and the load.
Ottawa Citizen says Chicoms are responsible for high real-estate prices in Vancouver:
http://ottawacitizen.com/business/energy/the-continuing-corruption-from-beijings-dirty-money
So would that make them racist?
So, just a follow on.
Designing the perfect 12 volt camping system after much experimentation.
– Get one solar panel and the appropriate charge controller. 80 watt minimum.
– 200 amp hours worth of batteries, doesn’t matter if it’s 2 6V golf cart batteries in series or 2 Costco 12V batteries in parallel.
– no, you cannot run the air conditioner, the coffee pot or the hair dryer. No you can not.
– Colman sells a coffee pot that goes on your propane stove though. To my knowledge they do not sell air conditioners or hair dryers.
– small inverters from Canadian Tire or other retailers will charge your phone or run your small LDC TV. I have a 700 watt inverter from Radio Shack and it’s served us well for several years and I paid like $150 on sale.
– We also have a number of plug in 75 watt inverters from Canadian Tire regularly $30 we got for $14. Sale.
– Put 12 volt outlets of the type you can buy at Canadian Tire in strategic locations around the trailer. I mean the type that offer 2 12 volt plugs and 2 USB chargers. For some reason they don’t install this stuff, but I just wired it to the nearest 12V light myself.
– Laptops, iPads, iPhones, phones in general, are not a worry. They are already energy efficient because they are designed to run off small batteries. Charge at will. You need an inverter or a USB charger though.
– Get a frickin suitcase inverter style generator if you want to use a generator. The rest of you sound like lawnmowers and you are hardly charging the batteries. They aren’t much more money anymore and they use less fuel.
– For things like TV’s and sound systems, look at the wattage they consume. A big plasma will kill your batteries. A small LDC provides hours of entertainment for the kids when it’s raining.
– Swap out the incandescent lights for LDC’s. Not all of them, too expensive, but do swap out the ones that are on the most.
@#49 Rainclouds
ahhhhhh but politicians have so much better Press coverage……I think it might have something to do with the fart catchers in the MSM.
Trust me. I’m right about this.
I’m an expert when it come to fartz.
BRAVO GARTH! BRAVO!!!
Would you consider a speaking tour down under? My couch folds out.
Aaron
Windontario.ca
Garth: Did you actually send this message to Nick, in addition to posting it to your blog? If so, it would be interesting to read his reply.
http://www.ieso.ca
Hello, Mr. Turner. In case no one has posted it between your bedtime and my comment, I wanted to mention that although he hasn’t directly responded, Mr. Xenophon has put a link on his site to an Australian article about today’s post.
Here’s the front page of Mr. Xenophon’s site:
http://www.nickxenophon.com.au/
And here’s the article to which he linked, entitled ‘Garth Turner hammers Nick Xenophon’ (#10 Stomper linked to another relevant article from MacroBusiness; this is a new one):
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2014/08/garth-turner-hammers-nick-xenophon/
Be forewarned, the comments section does contain some of the colourful, peppery language that we know and love from Australians.
One more thing, Mr. Turner. Macrobusiness has quoted your article, verbatim, in its entirety. This includes the statement “And, of course, we both fondle goats”, but without the pertinent photograph. You may want to leave a comment on their site, explaining the statement, just to salvage whatever reputation Canadians may still have with the Australian public.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-s-trade-surplus-with-the-world-rises-to-1-9b-in-june-1.2728840
Watch that Canadian dollar start ticking up again if this trend continues. Canada’s not importing as much stuff, and the state of the RE market and household formation definitely is a factor here.
Australia = Canada = concentrated Immigration into the cities like never before and Temporary Immigration like never before.
Don’t believe any other drivel.
The markets are always right!
We thank you, Garth!
Leadership isn’t always easy. As Bruce Cockburn said, ‘Kick at the darkness ’til it bleeds daylight.’
Mark:
For the love of god, please stop posting…oh wait, we would be lost without you …
http://www.theautomaticearth.com/nicole-foss-on-australian-national-radio/
Nicole Foss interview on Aussi National Radio where she talks about their housing bubble .
#4 Ben
I think Garth had a good grasp of economics at the time, but poor grasp of politics. A temporary plan to buy votes of young people that costs the government nothing, increases house prices and fuels the wealth effect? Temporary? Really? Did the guys who proposed this keep a straight face long enough to get past the admin assistant?
Hey, I hand out crack to these people, it keeps them happy and coming back for more. What could possibly go wrong?
If solar power was such a great idea, everyone (who matters) would be doing it. But they are not, and there is a reason for it. It is still a highly experimental field in its infancy. Solar panels are, like ‘green cars’ not green at all, have atrocious efficiency, which plunges to near zero very quickly over their surprisingly short life spans. The entire industry survives on government subsidies. Government needs to gtfo of this industry, instead of forcing it down everyone’s throats. When it is economically feasible and sustainable, it will take off like a rocket on its own, and not a second before then.
Meanwhile, enjoy your subsidies and warm and fuzzy feel goods. That’s all they are.
Garth, how could I not respond to todays blog. Being a South Australian and of course a long time reader.
Long term Blog dogs would remember my almost daily comments on the blog. With a change to my circumstances, limiting the time spent on the net I still find time to read your posts on a daily basis.
Nick means well I do support his anti gambling stance and many of his other positions. However he has this first home owner idea completely wrong.
It is also important to note that Nick has several investment properties and takes full advantage of our crazy negative gearing tax system here in Australia.
The question that needs to be asked is are there any politicians who might support lower house prices and if not why?.
Perhaps this might explain why the political class are so reluctant to change the current situation.
The conflict of interest killing housing reform
Can Australians expect sensible housing reform when politicians have so much skin in the game? Or will self-interest continue to make Australian housing increasingly unaffordable for younger Australians?
Last week Independent Senator Nick Xenophon announced a plan to let first home buyers access their superannuation savings to pay for a housing deposit. His stated intention was to improve housing affordability, but by boosting housing demand, his plan would mainly benefit existing home owners and investors (A worrisome debt trap for first home buyers, July 29). Real estate agents and property developers would also be big winners.
If passed, Xenophon’s plan would be a continuation of decades of housing policy that has boosted prices but failed to increase home ownership or improve housing affordability. It would follow in the footsteps of negative gearing, the capital gains tax concession and the first home owner grant: three policies that have contributed to some of the most unaffordable real estate in the world.
But the question is why? Are our politicians simply ignorant? Are they naïve to the effects that these policies have on house prices and affordability? Or is there something more despicable going on?
Recent work by housing researchers Paul Egan and Philip Soos and former strategy consultant Lindsay David (whose previous work I touched upon here), assesses the housing assets held by Australian politicians.
In 2013, the 226 members of parliament (150 in the House of Representatives and 76 in the Senate) owned 563 properties (an average of around 2.5 properties per member), which the researchers value at around $300 million.
The Coalition and Labor Party agree on little but they are a united ticket on property investment. Around 91 per cent of all Senators own real estate, while 95 per cent of members in the House of Representatives own property. Both numbers greatly exceed property ownership among the general public.
The members with the largest property holdings are Barry O’Sullivan (NP, 50 properties), David Gillespie (NP, 18 properties), Clive Palmer (PUP, 13 properties) Natasha Griggs (CLP, 12 properties) and Karen Andrews (LIB, 12 properties).
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/politics/conflict-interest-killing-housing-reform?utm_source=exact&utm_medium=email&utm_content=850183&utm_campaign=kgb&modapt=
Nick is only worried about his own investment properties.
I read your post on our Senator Nick Xenophon with interest; he wants to establish the Australian version of the Canadian scheme.
Yesterday, along with two colleagues, I released research into the property holdings of Australian federal politicians, which amounts to an estimated (and conservative) $300 million, with 226 politicians owning 563 properties. This conflict of interest obviously makes it difficult for genuine housing reform to be enacted.
The research went absolutely viral, we’ve never had such a response to any of our writings. It turns out that these property-laden politicians make a lot of people angry.
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2014/08/aussie-politicians-300m-property-portfolio/
http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-many-houses-of-parliament-propertyrich-pollies-have-vested-interest-in-high-prices-20140806-10110y.html
Regards,
Philip
Australia is following Canada down the same path, and it is widely known how those in Government have a vested interest in propping up the ponzi.
There are so many industries in Aussie Land that have a vested interest in Real Estate I can’t see it ever collapsing.
The unemployment figures were released today and they were shockers – all heading North.
Rumour has it that there will be another rate cut before the end of the year.
“Canada Revenue Agency stats found almost half (47%) of the borrowers who raided their RRSPs haven’t paid anything back. So the missed payments are added to their incomes and taxed.”
Yikes….and not even taking into account the current year’s missed contribution. I wonder what the total percentage would then be?
Retirement savings, personal savings and re should be long-term and ideally, real-time parallel investments for diversification- not hijacked into a single pot. Borrowing has gone completely insane in Canada.
What a disastrous recipe for old age.
Garth
Thank you for this post.
Quick question.
When you walk around the parliament, those who work there approach you or simply looking forward you find that they change their way?
What about if you tell them, !Hello, I decided to get back to work with you guys!
It’s remind me the book “Atlas Shrugged” when the best of the society decides to step aside.
We need you there Garth!!!, even if you liver will suffer for the effort.
#7 Human Capital on 08.06.14 at 7:50 pm
No kidding.
“Macroprudential policy”.
I really wish politicians would stop using words they don’t understand. They can be very dangerous, because we then end up with millions of old people eating date-expired crap from the dusty rear aisles of discount shops.
Banks keep racing to the bottom on mortgage rates… email came to me today from TD for 4-yr fixed @ 2.77%.
https://www.tdcanadatrust.com/products-services/banking/mortgages/numbers-resl_b.jsp
Yes, you can get slightly lower with the non-bank lenders like True North, but this still seems quite a bit like the promo rates Flaherty frowned upon.
speaking of distortion
Leveraged Loans Are Increasing and With Higher Leverage, Causing Concerns Among Regulators (OCC Graph Released in June 2014)
the “business model” UN changed
…”In 1929 National City Bank made bad loans and packaged them up as securities and sold them to unwary investors. Last month, Citigroup paid a $7 billion fine for making bad loans and packaging them up as securities and selling them to unwary investors.”
Citigroup Offers Five Times Leverage to Bank Depositors to Trade in Foreign Currencies
By Pam Martens: August 4, 2014
http://wallstreetonparade.com/
Foreign Currency Leveraged Investment – Citibank Hong Kong
http://www.citibank.com.hk › Home › Investments › Foreign Exchange Services
Citibank Foreign Currency Leveraged Investment can help investors increase their investment power by up to 5 times, enabling them to capture any upside potential on foreign exchange market movement. Please note that FX investments are subject to rate fluctuations, which may present both opportunities and risks, …
@#105 learningfromyou.
“It’s remind me the book “Atlas Shrugged” when the best of the society decides to step aside…..”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please dont get Ayn Rands Army started. She loves the vino and babbles incessantly when you mention any of her books.
‘Prices have been falling in most Canadian centres, although only a few percentage points at best thus far.’
Where I live, 416, we call it ‘The Summer’, a good time to buy.
Traditionally the market heats up in the Fall.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KskwLBc9hc
That was a great reminder to the Ausie politician. If he listens it will mean he is the one making the calls, if he does not it means he is just a puppet and someone else ($$$) is pulling his strings.
Fools.
If interest rates hadn’t been messed with in the first place, none of this sh*t would have happened. Tptb have fallen in love with the idea that they are “players” and are nothing but power trippers.
Hey Aussi Roy welcome back mate!
The only way government programs can be temporary are: 1) if it costs them money or 2) if it has a defined expiry date, or more likely both.
Interesting; house rentals on kijiji in Edmonton as recently as 6 weeks ago used to be fairly even – offering vs. wanted at 1100-1300, depending on the time of month. As of today, there are over 1500 houses being offered, 450 more than are wanted. They must not be selling……. funny, the EREB never mentioned.
I’m enjoying this discussion on solar…
#73 Inglorious Investor on 08.06.14 at 11:09 pm on microFIT:
“And that did not include potential repairs to damaged solar panels…”
Solar panels are fairly resilient. If one gets knocked out by a bird which has become petrified and lost its sense of direction, you have purchased insurance for them, and it is not costly.
“…or replacement of worn out parts (which are basically unknown).”
The panels have no moving parts to wear out. The inverters are warrantied for 15 years in most cases, so what’s unknown?
“After I decided to forgo this ‘opportunity’ the government cut the pay rate to around 60¢/kWh. Making the ROI even worse.”
The Ontario government has cut the rate because the price of panels has continued to fall dramatically.
“At the end of the contract your PV installation will likely be worth nothing due to wear and tear, diminished efficiency, and technological obsolescence.”
In twenty years’ time, the solar panels will have become about 10% less efficient. They will still produce. You’re likely right about their being obsolete in comparison with new panels, but they will still produce electricity, and thus still have some value.
All we need to know about you is this statement you made: “…not like real estate, which generally appreciates in value.” Buy a new house and neglect to replace the electrical fixtures, plumbing fixtures, siding, shingles, water heater, furnace, flooring, cabinets, paint, windows, or anything else. Come back in twenty years and tell us how much the building has appreciated.
Many (including Nick, it seems) have no respect or appreciation for the free market. The best solution to high house prices is high house prices. The market is self-correcting. No need to tinker, that just makes things worse.
Hello Blog Dogs!
Hope you can help me with a article that Garth posted a while back. I had it bookmarked but lost them, and I have tried a search but have come up empty so I’m hoping to make use of the HiveMind.
His article was about:
-how the less than 100K worth group starts out investing (I know he has a ‘breakdown of portfolio’ about once every week, but I mean the “first step: get your money out of mutual funds; second step: get a fee-based advisor” instructions of a particular article I’m thinking of)
-how one might select a fee-based advisor for this level of investing
-next steps after the 100K gets to the ‘next level’
Thanks gang!
If you happen to notice a cigarette butt in a gutter, don’t be too quick to scorn it as disgusting and useless.
Well, yes, it’s still disgusting, but a team of South Korean scientists says it’s no longer useless. In fact, they’ve used the butts to create a material that could store energy in superconductors for use in all manner of devices from computers to electric cars.
The stuff of cigarette filters, in fact, offers better performance than the substances already available for use in superconductors, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene, according to their findings published Aug. 5 in the Institute of Physics’ journal Nanotechnology.
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Cigarette-Butts-Offer-Solution-To-Supercapacitors-Energy-Storage.html
http://blog.australiaboomtobust.com/2014/08/propertied-federal-political-class/ – “The public should ask “Are the property holdings of our federal politicians negatively influencing policy and causing them to ignore evidence?” The parliamentary register of members’ interests may help to answer this question [] It is evident that politicians are heavily invested in the property game, with the 226 members in both houses of parliament with an ownership stake in a total of 563 properties []” Has anyone obtained similar data for Canadian politicians?
#51 Smoking Man on 08.06.14 at 9:38 pm
JimH only reason I was asking about Bullhead Az
Be down in your neck of the woods, Aug24 to Aug 28
Being a budding pilot you are, there is a place on Narada, that rent out Extra300 we can dog fight each other…
About 600 bucks, only draw back, we got to take one of there pilots with us.
You in…
………………………………………………………………………
Holy $hit Smoking Man piloting a plane, stay as far away as possible from Nevada or Narada or Arizona on August 24-28th.
Beware of things flying.
You can put a tuxedo on a goat but its still a goat!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhpHuHxrWHk
This one is for Smoking Man, please join.
http://ufocontact.com/
A 30% correction in the US carved $6 trillion from the middle class, precipitated a global recession and permanently injured the finances of millions. I would not underestimate the consequences of a correction here, of any magnitude. — Garth
I would be more worried if you didn’t own a house albeit a minor short term price correction that may be coming. Stop being the doom and gloom guy a la Farber.
Btw, GTA sales up and up in July.
“They can be very dangerous, because we then end up with millions of old people eating date-expired crap from the dusty rear aisles of discount shops.”
As opposed to what? The millions of young people who have to do the same today, despite being able to work, but not allowed to work because the economy isn’t churning out sufficient jobs to keep up with population growth?
The extreme unemployment problem is one of the reasons, amongst many, why policy rates are going to remain low for at least years to come.
Good to know you are still around Aussie Roy …
“Has anyone obtained similar data for Canadian politicians?”
A friend of mine (RIP) was a young Tory MP, and told me that it was very common to, as soon as he and his colleagues got elected in Ottawa, use their housing allowance to make payments on a condo out there.
Not sure how many did so, but the way he spoke, it was quite a common practice, for MP’s from Western Canada to purchase housing in Ottawa and fund the mortgage with their housing/living out allowance.
Sales are up? Sales are down?
http://www.cjad.com/cjad-news/2014/08/03/montreal-housing-sales-slump
Sales are up? Sales are down? Part 2.
http://saskatoon.ctvnews.ca/saskatoon-housing-inventory-at-six-year-high-realtors-1.1948144
Isn’t this the time when saving for retirement and getting out of debt is paramount. Least that’s what they told me.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-08-07/thirty-something-canadians-most-indebted-after-home-boom
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/Building-permit-activity-drops-in-Manitoba-by-467-per-cent-between-May-and-June-270340511.html?cx_navSource=d-tiles-2
The slide has started !!!!
In today’s pic the protagonist/antagonist is wearing a blue shirt/yellow tie, too.
I’m rooting for the goat.
#122 Holy Crap Wheres The Tylenol on 08.07.14 at 12:
This one is for Smoking Man, please join.
http://ufocontact.com/
I’m the guest of honor…
#51 Smoking Man on 08.06.14 at 9:38 pm
JimH only reason I was asking about Bullhead Az
Be down in your neck of the woods, Aug24 to Aug 28
Being a budding pilot you are, there is a place on Narada, that rent out Extra300 we can dog fight each other…
About 600 bucks, only draw back, we got to take one of there pilots with us.
You in…
______________________________________________
Been there done that a few years ago Smoking Man, did it at Sky Combat Ace in Las Vegas. It was the Top Gun Experienece. I was semi bored though as they won’t let you take off or land the aircraft. I was IFR rated once when I was in the USAF back in the eraly 70’s. Have fun its not like flying a C-5 or a C-141. I once got the opportunity to take a F-4 Phantom up for some rides from one base to another in Vietnam. That was very cool.
Cheers
#132 Smoking Man on 08.07.14 at 1:24 pm
#122 Holy Crap Wheres The Tylenol on 08.07.14 at 12:
This one is for Smoking Man, please join.
http://ufocontact.com/
I’m the guest of honor…
_____________________________________________
Have a friend who once had a close encounters of the Third Kind out in Alberta. Swears on his mothers grave it happened. Still good friends with him, smart guy too.
He is a real estate investor with tons of loot. We are talking tens of millions, so he can’t be that nuts.
#129 Rick said on 08.07.14 at 1:03 pm
The slide has started !!!!
———————————————-
guess it depends on what is being fed to the media and what we will believe as sheeple…..!
Little comparison to reality….<
Mark : with a discount for the lack of dispatch ability, spinning reserve capability, and some other technical aspects such as reactive power creation.
lack of dispatch ability – that means that you can flip the switch and it goes on – you cannot do that with solar or wind power
spinning reserve capability – that means that once you have more than 5 % solar or wind or have to have the turbines spinning so that you can instantly draw power when you need it
reactive power creation. – what’s that?
solar and wind have been oversold. Basic problem is nobody has been able to store electricity
senator Patrick Brazeau has until Friday to leave his Gatineau, Que., home and hand the keys over to his bank.
The bank is trying to recoup $189,778.18, which is the amount left on Brazeau’s mortgage, as well as an additional $11,237.54 from another loan. According to the city of Gatineau, the home is valued at $240,300.
http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/08/07/patrick-brazeau-to-be-booted-from-home
hmm, I think this supports Garth’s contention that housing is hurt’n dans la belle province. I mean if you owe $190,000 and the house is worth $240,000 why not just sell and get out? I’m guessing the house is worth $190,000 and Patrick would have to write a cheque for $20,000. Which he doesn’t have.
Thats the way to show us Russia just who you are!
Way to go Putin!
vee no import goot food from vest nomore, now Russia eat only Russian food from Chernobyl!
Da Chernobyl tomatoes glow in dark, easy to find!
http://news.msn.com/world/russia-bans-western-food-over-ukraine-sanctions
I like Goats Head Soup. Thats about it for goats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcZn2-bGXqQ
Home ownership in Australia is not a necessity as sleeping out in a tent there you can do pretty much 24/7/365 and you live. In Canada 24/7/90, then you die!
“reactive power creation. – what’s that?”
Its a very highly technical aspect of the power system/electrical engineering, referring to current which flows between capacitive and inductive elements of the system, but does not actually contribute to physical work or heat creation.
Typically in a power system, it is used as a measure of ‘voltage support’, and much of a power systems’ reactive power requirements are created by turbine generators by varying synchronous generator excitation by way of an AVR.
It is because of reactive power that you can’t, in doing AC power calculations, simply go P = IV. You have to use phasors, and the heavy duty mathematics thus involved.
That’s the first year EE course version of it. To get more into it, I suggest you Google for additional resources.
To make a long story short, reactive power is, just like those other aspects we discussed, not really a characteristic of solar energy production. Thus lowering its value and requiring supplemental resources as backup.
This is the U.S. story:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/rental-affordability-crisis-hud
It would be nice to see the Canadian one:
….
Xeno owns 8 properties. He [the good senator], need not be a mouth piece for the Real Estate Industrial Complex, he only needs to speaks on his own behalf.
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2014/08/aussie-politicians-300m-property-portfolio/
Granted, he maybe self-made. But, how would you like to see your investment portfolio perform?
Give them bread, circuses, and please! Just give them their Superannuation money (retirement/pension plans called elsewhere). Don’t legislate contrary to stupidity, don’t bother protecting people from themselves.
It’s like a switch got flipped on the markets last Thursday, when we experienced the first significant drop in equities. It seemed obvious that something had changed. It has been basically straight down since then and accelerating.
Markets never behaved like this back in the ninties and eighties, meaning straight up all asset classes followed y straight down all asset classes. Correlation on the way up and down is highest ever.
Just weird.
The Dow is off today 0.46%. Very scary. I guess you’ll wait for the bottom of the correction and bail, right?– Garth
hat was very cool.
Cheers
Holy Crap Wheres The Tylenol on 08.07.14 at 1:32 pmHave a friend who once had a close encounters of the Third Kind out in Alberta. Swears on his mothers grave it happened. Still good friends with him, smart guy too.
He is a real estate investor with tons of loot. We are talking tens of millions, so he can’t be that nuts.
………….
Did you visit that Web side… Tonight just for you, on my blog… Re et.
Few excerpts from my fiction novel… Now if I called it a biography, them men in white coats will show up…
At any case you will understand all…
Can’t do it now, I’m flying my space ship to Niagara Falls
#118 Nate on 08.07.14 at 10:59 am wrote:
Hope you can help me with an article that Garth posted a while back. I had it bookmarked but lost them…
The articles that you want are probably these:
Advice which explains how to hire a financial advisor and
INVESTING 101 which explains the basics of sensible investing.
I don’t think that Garth has written one article that combines both but what do I know…
Looks like those Chinese communist leaders are still true leftists:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-05-16/china-targets-70-gigawatts-of-solar-power-to-cut-coal-reliance.html
They are installing 70 gigs of solar just because it is a nice thing to do.
Some of you armchair energy experts on this blog should warn China before it is too late…
I agree with #24 Joseph, that HBP can work for some folks if they ‘think things through’. Ie, don’t borrow what you can’t pay back. I borrowed $20k in 2000, and will pay it all back in a couple of years. Of course, prices then were not crazy like nowadays, and the price of my first condo was about 3x income (in TO). Paid the mortgage off in 5 years (I was just a few years into my career and my income doubled within 5 years). Now of course, I don’t expect my income to rise much (if at all), and the price of a decent home (now living in Vanc) would be 10x income, so…now I’m renting.
I’m not surprised people aren’t paying back the HBP. The HBP was being used as an interest free loan which didn’t count as a debt. The money was already earmarked for their downpayment.
There’s nothing wrong with taking your $20k, putting it in an RRSP, collecting a fat return, waiting 6 months then buying a house, and returning the taxes to the government for the next 15 years. You’re paying back taxes you would have had to pay anyway.
If it saves you 1% of your house price in CMHC fees, or keeps you out of your credit card for closing costs, it’s worth it.
“Some of you armchair energy experts on this blog should warn China before it is too late…”
There’s huge amounts of malinvestment in China. Empty cities and the like. So what’s a few solar panels ontop of that?
China also has an abundance of water-power which goes well with the solar. The southern United States and even Ontario, not so much.
#116 Rational Optimist on 08.07.14 at 10:55 am
“Solar panels are fairly resilient. If one gets knocked out […] you have purchased insurance for them, and it is not costly.
” The panels have no moving parts to wear out. The inverters are warrantied for 15 years in most cases, so what’s unknown?
“The Ontario government has cut the rate because the price of panels has continued to fall dramatically.
“In twenty years’ time, the solar panels will have become about 10% less efficient. They will still produce.
“All we need to know about you is this statement you made: “…not like real estate, which generally appreciates in value.” Buy a new house and neglect to replace the electrical fixtures, plumbing fixtures, siding, shingles, water heater, furnace, flooring, cabinets, paint, windows, or anything else. Come back in twenty years and tell us how much the building has appreciated.”
———————–
Hey, R.O., so either you joined the MicorFIT club or you sell PV panels? Whatever works for you, man. I’m not judging.
Not trying to step on anyone’s toes here, just passing on my thoughts and experience.
That said…
My criticisms were of the MicroFIT program, not PV panels or solar energy per se.
So, I realize that the insurance premium would not be much, perhaps around $70/year, at least in my case, for a 10 kW system. However, no only did my ROI calculation not include insurance costs, but it also did not include: maintenance, repairs, inverter replacement, home connection fee, billing fee, monitoring fee (optional), possible building permit, possible roof replacement (if your roof is old at the time of the PV install, it likely makes sense to resurface the roof first).
Now, the reason I did not include these items is because some of them are pithy costs, and some are only probable, except perhaps for the inverters. But IF you did incur a major repair, replacement, removal due to a roofing issue, etc. etc. the costs could really eat into an already low real ROI. And remember, my calculation was based on a lowly 2.5% inflation rate. The actual historical rate over the past, say, 30 years is more like 3%. But a) that’s the CPI, not real inflation; and b) inflation (i.e. reduced purchasing power of money) is likely to be much higher than 3%. Current estimates put it at between 5% and 10%.
And my calculation was based on CASH. Many people borrow the money to join the MicrFIT club, which just makes the ROI that much worse because you’re paying interest to finance a depreciating asset.
As for PV deficiency, I believe your estimate of 10% is low. Most info I have says about 3% just the first year alone, and then about 1% every year after that. If that were true, then over twenty years the efficiency would drop about 22%, not 10%. And the life expectancy of PV panels is only about 25 years, only 5 years longer than a MicroFIT contract. They may last longer, but you can’t count on “ifs and maybes” when calculating ROI–at least I don’t.
As for comparing PV panels to real estate, anyone who knows anything about real estate knows the real value is in the LAND and that any attached structure will, of course, depreciate over time, faster if poorly maintained. One reason I rail against condos, but that’s another story.
BTW, Rational Optimist…
Even though I think your deficiency rating of 10% may be low, that’s the figure I actually used in my ROI calculation, potentially making the real ROI even a bit lower than what I originally calculated.
One more thing, Rational Optimist. And this one works in your favour—I do try to be fair…
My ROI calculation was after tax. As a home owner who would have to pay regular income tax on the revenues from MicroFIT, I used an average income tax rate of 30%. So if you look at it from a pre-tax standpoint, the ROI looks somewhat better. About as good as a GIC?
I am anxious to see what he calls you …
Have been holding up on Cash lately for a correction in Equity. Garth, wanted your opinion. Thinking of putting that cash to use and buy lots of international, US and Canadian ETFs.
Earnings are solid, lots of rumors on what Putin might do. But as they say buy the rumor and sell the news.
your take?
Let us know if you ever hear from him.
#3 Randy on 08.06.14 at 7:43 pm
I think that there are several billion in the middle east who fondle goats. Maybe worse, but the goats can’t talk.
——————-
These “several billion” – you have seen them fondling?
Racist much?
51 Smoking Man on 08.06.14 at 9:38 pm
“… Be down in your neck of the woods, Aug24 to Aug 28
Being a budding pilot you are, there is a place on Narada, that rent out Extra300 we can dog fight each other…
About 600 bucks, only draw back, we got to take one of there pilots with us…”
==================================
Sounds like it would be a real hoot, SM! I’m SOL until late November through mid-April.
Wish I was a “budding” pilot… just a run-of-the-mill “retired” one (SEL, IFR ratings).
You ever get down south central AZ (Tucson area)?
[…] find out about developments in the Aussie housing market from Canadian ex-finance-ministers, but Garth Turner ran an interesting piece yesterday about Senator Nick Xenophon’s proposals to make housing “more affordable”. In short, he says […]
Wind and solar power cost far more than anyone expected.
http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/oil-price/solar-wind-power-more-expensive-than-thought
I’m a supporter of nuclear power but I’m terrified of it. Arnie Gundersen has done a great job of describing the disaster at Fukushima. This is a terrible shock. Japan has suffered a terrible loss.
http://www.fairewinds.org
#73 Inglorious Investor on 08.06.14 at 11:09 pm & Mark &Etc.
It looks to me like the Microfit system as you describe it, is way different from mine. “Now, under the MircoFIT program, the power you generate does not go toward off-setting your own grid consumption. You use the grid just like anybody else. You simply get paid for whatever electricity you generate…”
================================
All the plans I’m familiar with down here (both MO and AZ) are “Net-Metering” plans; plans where your production is simply deducted from your useage; as if the meter ‘runs backwards’ when production>consumption. Yes, any “over production” at the time of the once-a-year and the utility cuts you a check for the juice they bought, but this is only at the reduced rate of $0.035/Kwh. This ‘sale’ is, of course, taxable.
The grant/incentive/tax-credit combinations are set up in conjunction with the local utilities in such a way that projected production is =< projected consumption. That determines the ceiling of the grant/incentive/tax-credit package.
The AZ sun/belt is riddled with residential and commercial solar panel installations. Arizona is not a State heavily populated by "lefties" and "tree-huggers" (well, except MAYBE when the waves of Canadian 'Snowbirds' arrive in the fall to help boost the pop. of greater Phoenix/Mesa by over 11%)! On the contrary… Arizona is a heavily Republican State, and Republicans are not known for their overwhelming support of "lefty" of "tree-hugging" policies. They are much more drawn to ideas that can make/save them money, whether they need it or not!
There are so many roof-top mounted and on-ground (cheaper) installations in Arizona for the simple reason that it makes such good, plain economic sense down here. Ontario? Not so sure about that! Solar PV is best applied in environments south of 40 degrees lat.
There seems to be a lot of confusion about the viability of these systems, even though they have been operating with ever-increasing efficiency and ever declining costs since the 1980's.
Funny thing; I guess none of the negative arm-chair experts on this blog told Volkswagen how ridiculous this installation is:
http://www.smainverted.com/2013/03/19/volkswagen-brings-big-solar-to-tennessee-with-largest-automotive-solar-park-in-the-u-s/
or got in touch with Arizona to shoot down this before it was too late…
see also http://www.forbes.com/sites/uciliawang/2014/04/29/behold-the-worlds-largest-solar-panel-power-plant-in-arizona/
or contributed to this…
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2013/03/how-solar-pv-is-winning-over-csp
To HiveMind:
Those were the articles!
Thank you very much!
Do you think Garth would give a specific recommendation on a fee-based advisor in a particular area? Or is it like his rule against promoting individual stocks?
Cheers and thanks again,
Nate
Financial Post says: “In terms of financing, 42.1% of the Toronto and Vancouver investor households surveyed said they had no mortgage on their last purchased condominium unit.”
Either there’s a lot of rich people in Toronto, or, we do have a lot of foreign investors.