<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juiced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/10/30/juiced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/10/30/juiced/</link>
	<description>Book and Weblog - Authored by Garth Turner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: West Coast</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/10/30/juiced/comment-page-4/#comment-48528</link>
		<dc:creator>West Coast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3904#comment-48528</guid>
		<description>&quot;Real estate market in recovery: CMHC&quot;
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/11/02/consumer-housing-starts-cmhc.html#socialcomments



...Some days I just don&#039;t know why I read the cbc news blog. It has become a sick combo of tabloid journalism and market hyping. At least it looks like most commentors on the story are catching on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Real estate market in recovery: CMHC&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/11/02/consumer-housing-starts-cmhc.html#socialcomments" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/11/02/consumer-housing-starts-cmhc.html#socialcomments</a></p>
<p>&#8230;Some days I just don&#8217;t know why I read the cbc news blog. It has become a sick combo of tabloid journalism and market hyping. At least it looks like most commentors on the story are catching on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJD</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/10/30/juiced/comment-page-4/#comment-48516</link>
		<dc:creator>RJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3904#comment-48516</guid>
		<description>DaBull has been drinking DaCarneyJuice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaBull has been drinking DaCarneyJuice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxpayer like you</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/10/30/juiced/comment-page-4/#comment-48483</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxpayer like you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3904#comment-48483</guid>
		<description>163 confused

Yes it would be better if the stats were more recent. Its 
kinda like finding out you were right then having to wait 
five years for verification.

I probably mis-interpreted your post at 160 a little. The rental income for the owners should appear under their household/economic family income, thus appearing twice as both income for the renters and landlords. Yep, confusing. If the landlord is a company, I&#039;m guessing it only appears as hh/ef income if it pays out a wage or dividend to stockholders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>163 confused</p>
<p>Yes it would be better if the stats were more recent. Its<br />
kinda like finding out you were right then having to wait<br />
five years for verification.</p>
<p>I probably mis-interpreted your post at 160 a little. The rental income for the owners should appear under their household/economic family income, thus appearing twice as both income for the renters and landlords. Yep, confusing. If the landlord is a company, I&#8217;m guessing it only appears as hh/ef income if it pays out a wage or dividend to stockholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalgaryRocks</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/10/30/juiced/comment-page-4/#comment-48478</link>
		<dc:creator>CalgaryRocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3904#comment-48478</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;of course it doesnâ€™t bother you at all that CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, etc. are every single one of them shills for the Demcraps. One alternative voice out there and you get your knickers in a twist. It is laughable.&lt;/i&gt;

Well I used to watch it but then I figured out I was being manipulated into believing things that were false. Constant innuendo, exagerations and character assassination take a toll. 

So now Fox news makes me puke. I find it irritating and transparent propaganda.  This has nothing to do with the leaning of the other stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>of course it doesnâ€™t bother you at all that CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, etc. are every single one of them shills for the Demcraps. One alternative voice out there and you get your knickers in a twist. It is laughable.</i></p>
<p>Well I used to watch it but then I figured out I was being manipulated into believing things that were false. Constant innuendo, exagerations and character assassination take a toll. </p>
<p>So now Fox news makes me puke. I find it irritating and transparent propaganda.  This has nothing to do with the leaning of the other stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 305/321 objects using disk

Served from: www.greaterfool.ca @ 2012-02-08 14:02:13 -->
