<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/09/27/house-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/09/27/house-com/</link>
	<description>Book and Weblog - Authored by Garth Turner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/09/27/house-com/comment-page-3/#comment-44729</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3581#comment-44729</guid>
		<description>monetary inflation will trump weak demand and prices will rise. Paper currency has no backing except for the word of corrupt central bankers. They will use the stealth tax of inflation to pay off their deficits.  And this will be reflected in higher prices in tangable assets like gold, silver, oil, copper. Housing will drop because of higher unemployment and falling demand as well as lending rates rising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>monetary inflation will trump weak demand and prices will rise. Paper currency has no backing except for the word of corrupt central bankers. They will use the stealth tax of inflation to pay off their deficits.  And this will be reflected in higher prices in tangable assets like gold, silver, oil, copper. Housing will drop because of higher unemployment and falling demand as well as lending rates rising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill-Muskoka (NAM)</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/09/27/house-com/comment-page-3/#comment-44606</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill-Muskoka (NAM)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3581#comment-44606</guid>
		<description>#108  Herb

Isn&#039;t it typical of people such as #110  rory to say &lt;i&gt;you have to be a lefty as their responses to things they disagree with are to attack the person, not debate the issueâ€¦cheers Herbie&lt;/i&gt; completing ignoring he has reduced the exchange to a Harper like rhetoric?  If anyone attacks the person the Harperites are the Supreme Experts at that low life approach.  What is that defining term for such tactics?  Of yes, HYPOCRITES!  Soon to be revised in the world&#039;s dictionaries to Harpercrites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#108  Herb</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it typical of people such as #110  rory to say <i>you have to be a lefty as their responses to things they disagree with are to attack the person, not debate the issueâ€¦cheers Herbie</i> completing ignoring he has reduced the exchange to a Harper like rhetoric?  If anyone attacks the person the Harperites are the Supreme Experts at that low life approach.  What is that defining term for such tactics?  Of yes, HYPOCRITES!  Soon to be revised in the world&#8217;s dictionaries to Harpercrites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/09/27/house-com/comment-page-3/#comment-44587</link>
		<dc:creator>wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3581#comment-44587</guid>
		<description>#75, #85, et al.

As North Van Dude pointed out, women now make up the majority of the Canadian work force - not to mention also being the majority of the Canadian population.

Some of us also even earn more than our partners. In my case, 3x more. If we based things off only the &quot;man&#039;s income&quot;, we&#039;d never buy a home, even if homes in Victoria were affordable @ 3X annual wages.

Is it really so hard for people to make similar points, but without the sexist language? Why not &quot;based off the income of the highest earner&quot;?

(&amp; @#81 - Thank FSM that the rule of thumb for me is to beat men with a 2x4, but only when absolutely necessary... what, can&#039;t you take a joke?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#75, #85, et al.</p>
<p>As North Van Dude pointed out, women now make up the majority of the Canadian work force &#8211; not to mention also being the majority of the Canadian population.</p>
<p>Some of us also even earn more than our partners. In my case, 3x more. If we based things off only the &#8220;man&#8217;s income&#8221;, we&#8217;d never buy a home, even if homes in Victoria were affordable @ 3X annual wages.</p>
<p>Is it really so hard for people to make similar points, but without the sexist language? Why not &#8220;based off the income of the highest earner&#8221;?</p>
<p>(&amp; @#81 &#8211; Thank FSM that the rule of thumb for me is to beat men with a 2&#215;4, but only when absolutely necessary&#8230; what, can&#8217;t you take a joke?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rory</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/09/27/house-com/comment-page-3/#comment-44584</link>
		<dc:creator>rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=3581#comment-44584</guid>
		<description>#108  Herb

I deduced as much but thought hey offer the olive branch ...as to C vs. L ...I fundamentally believe in smaller G ...the L do not therefore I have to side with the C when their is no visible difference between the two at present...simple ...just like me...as to my IQ ...you have to be a lefty as their responses to things they disagree with are to attack the person, not debate the issue...cheers Herbie ...may we continue to disagree....btw ...your still wrong ...rofl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#108  Herb</p>
<p>I deduced as much but thought hey offer the olive branch &#8230;as to C vs. L &#8230;I fundamentally believe in smaller G &#8230;the L do not therefore I have to side with the C when their is no visible difference between the two at present&#8230;simple &#8230;just like me&#8230;as to my IQ &#8230;you have to be a lefty as their responses to things they disagree with are to attack the person, not debate the issue&#8230;cheers Herbie &#8230;may we continue to disagree&#8230;.btw &#8230;your still wrong &#8230;rofl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 305/321 objects using disk

Served from: www.greaterfool.ca @ 2012-02-08 14:32:55 -->
