<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victoria bust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/01/31/victoria-bust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/01/31/victoria-bust/</link>
	<description>Book and Weblog - Authored by Garth Turner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadianoil</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/01/31/victoria-bust/comment-page-3/#comment-16982</link>
		<dc:creator>canadianoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=1537#comment-16982</guid>
		<description>#132
You are correct.
Victoria with children is a great place to be.
I sold Toronto and bought Oak bay, five years ago.
My goodness I feel blessed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#132<br />
You are correct.<br />
Victoria with children is a great place to be.<br />
I sold Toronto and bought Oak bay, five years ago.<br />
My goodness I feel blessed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwane</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/01/31/victoria-bust/comment-page-3/#comment-16935</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=1537#comment-16935</guid>
		<description>Victoria is a great place. It is quite quiet for a small city. Having bought here in 2002 before the price increase tat seem my value go up 286K(2002) to 615K (2007). I believe the Bank of Canada&#039;s inflation index would put my 286 to about 325K todays dollars. So whether the price is 2 million or 400,000 it is irrelevant to those that live here. We&#039;ve always had a next to nothing interest rate so thats a bit of a non-issue. Although prices will likely fall much further (now average price is about 545k) to the high 300&#039;s or low 400&#039;s its all about the quality of life you want. Although health care is a realistic issue for seniors. If your healthy move up island its cheaper and perhaps a better life style.
FYI I used municipal tax rates for (2007)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victoria is a great place. It is quite quiet for a small city. Having bought here in 2002 before the price increase tat seem my value go up 286K(2002) to 615K (2007). I believe the Bank of Canada&#8217;s inflation index would put my 286 to about 325K todays dollars. So whether the price is 2 million or 400,000 it is irrelevant to those that live here. We&#8217;ve always had a next to nothing interest rate so thats a bit of a non-issue. Although prices will likely fall much further (now average price is about 545k) to the high 300&#8242;s or low 400&#8242;s its all about the quality of life you want. Although health care is a realistic issue for seniors. If your healthy move up island its cheaper and perhaps a better life style.<br />
FYI I used municipal tax rates for (2007)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VicREBear</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/01/31/victoria-bust/comment-page-3/#comment-16806</link>
		<dc:creator>VicREBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=1537#comment-16806</guid>
		<description>Here are Victoria&#039;s year-over-year sales and price stats, courtesy of Roger, a regular poster and numbers analyst at HouseHuntVictoria:

GV - Greater Victoria
January 2008 shown in ()

MLS Sales - 247 (464) - Down 47%
MLS listings - 3678 (3027) - Up 22%

GV SFH Average - 526.1K (606.4K) - Down 13%
GV SFH Median - 475K (530.2K) - Down 10%
GV SFH Sales - 138 (228) - Down 39%

GV Condo Average - 259.7K (349K) - Down 26%
GV Condo Median - 255K (304.5K) - Down 16%
GV Condo Sales - 62 (125) - Down 50%

GV Town Average - 394K (423.3K) - Down 7%
GV Town Median - 382.5K (393K) - Down 3%
GV Town Sales - 32 (41) Down 22%

13 percent loss on average SFH; 26 percent slide for condos... where&#039;s that Victoria realtor who two years ago said to me, &quot;Well, you&#039;d better buy whatever you can afford, &#039;cause prices AREN&#039;T COMING DOWN!&quot;

Jackass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are Victoria&#8217;s year-over-year sales and price stats, courtesy of Roger, a regular poster and numbers analyst at HouseHuntVictoria:</p>
<p>GV &#8211; Greater Victoria<br />
January 2008 shown in ()</p>
<p>MLS Sales &#8211; 247 (464) &#8211; Down 47%<br />
MLS listings &#8211; 3678 (3027) &#8211; Up 22%</p>
<p>GV SFH Average &#8211; 526.1K (606.4K) &#8211; Down 13%<br />
GV SFH Median &#8211; 475K (530.2K) &#8211; Down 10%<br />
GV SFH Sales &#8211; 138 (228) &#8211; Down 39%</p>
<p>GV Condo Average &#8211; 259.7K (349K) &#8211; Down 26%<br />
GV Condo Median &#8211; 255K (304.5K) &#8211; Down 16%<br />
GV Condo Sales &#8211; 62 (125) &#8211; Down 50%</p>
<p>GV Town Average &#8211; 394K (423.3K) &#8211; Down 7%<br />
GV Town Median &#8211; 382.5K (393K) &#8211; Down 3%<br />
GV Town Sales &#8211; 32 (41) Down 22%</p>
<p>13 percent loss on average SFH; 26 percent slide for condos&#8230; where&#8217;s that Victoria realtor who two years ago said to me, &#8220;Well, you&#8217;d better buy whatever you can afford, &#8217;cause prices AREN&#8217;T COMING DOWN!&#8221;</p>
<p>Jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canuck</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/01/31/victoria-bust/comment-page-3/#comment-16784</link>
		<dc:creator>canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greaterfool.ca/?p=1537#comment-16784</guid>
		<description>My intent was not to distort and I&#039;m not a trained journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My intent was not to distort and I&#8217;m not a trained journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 305/321 objects using disk

Served from: www.greaterfool.ca @ 2012-02-08 15:38:07 -->
